|
|
Post by brightraven on Jan 13, 2020 11:48:10 GMT -6
Truth be known I do. One of the results of the ~ 2010/2012 (?) collaboration between ASA and RAAA resulted in both associations dramatically upgrading and expanding their respective animal search format & options. Admittedly my query was poorly worded. IMO natural and ET calves should be so designated on the progeny report itself. Slogging thru numerous registration numbers to determine natural versus ET is a decided oversight on behalf of both associations. MS Sugar C4 is shown as being born 1-16-15. No big deal. She is 4 years old and has had 3 natural born calves. At some point, they started flushing her. Hard to say how much she has been flushed and how productive the flushes have been. |
|
|
|
Post by brightraven on Jan 13, 2020 12:01:38 GMT -6
76Bar. She could not have been flushed very much. Think about it. She has been pregnant most of the time!!!
|
|
