|
|
Post by hook on Aug 5, 2019 6:37:19 GMT -6
I wonder if maybe the CT site has been sold? It hasnt. There is the possibility macon jr is running it now |
|
|
|
Post by cottagefarm on Aug 5, 2019 7:18:31 GMT -6
I wonder if maybe the CT site has been sold? It hasnt. There is the possibility macon jr is running it now How old is Macon Jr? this might explain some things |
|
|
|
Post by hook on Aug 5, 2019 7:21:36 GMT -6
It hasnt. There is the possibility macon jr is running it now How old is Macon Jr? this might explain some things Dont know. I would guess 50’s, maybe 40’s purely a guess |
|
|
|
Post by workinonit on Aug 5, 2019 11:29:51 GMT -6
How I couldn't understand how it was that a few who constantly get booted off can return and consistently stur the pot but others get the boot permanently...…. I was threatened with getting the boot as well.  Seriously??? Just by asking, privately, what was the deal? Very sad indeed. Seriously?!! I keep telling myself that there is no way in hell Macon would make inyati a Mod, but he is the only person there who would have the gaul to give you the boot!! If you decide to go out with guns blazing, let me know ahead of time so I can make it double barreled!! Yes, seriously.  I had been told that being a pain-in-the-ass is not a ban-able offense and that's why there is an "ignore" button, and that while stirring the pot is annoying, I should just "ignore" it. I then asked why is it that quite a few long-time members have been permanently banned for merely asking questions and/or posting the rules of the board and/or calling out the Mods for banning a so-called "pot stirrer" while allowing Ron & a couple of others, who not only stir the pot but fill it full of garbage & crap, are allowed to remain? And I was told that if I didn't like it I could leave. I did not get an actual answer to my question. I then, respectfully, asked where's the logic? Why is it that the rules only apply to some, but not to others? And I had mentioned that I had been a member since 2004 and have never in all these years seen anything like that on the CT board. It was made clear that if I were to continue on this path of questioning that I too could find myself in the same position as the "others" who have been banned. I asked if that was a threat. Once again I received no answer to that question but was told that I could take their comment any way that I choose to.  Keep in mind, that this whole exchange took place in PRIVATE messages, not out on the open forums, and I pointed THAT out to them as well, questioning them as to how I could possibly be breaking any of the rules by trying to find answers in private messages. More on "Private Messages" later. |
|
|
|
Post by jehosofat on Aug 5, 2019 11:57:11 GMT -6
When folks are intent on being pricks, you just gotta let em be pricks and move on. Screw CT, I like it here.
|
|
|
|
Post by tcranch on Aug 6, 2019 8:43:55 GMT -6
Seriously?!! I keep telling myself that there is no way in hell Macon would make inyati a Mod, but he is the only person there who would have the gaul to give you the boot!! If you decide to go out with guns blazing, let me know ahead of time so I can make it double barreled!! Yes, seriously. I had been told that being a pain-in-the-ass is not a ban-able offense and that's why there is an "ignore" button, and that while stirring the pot is annoying, I should just "ignore" it. I then asked why is it that quite a few long-time members have been permanently banned for merely asking questions and/or posting the rules of the board and/or calling out the Mods for banning a so-called "pot stirrer" while allowing Ron & a couple of others, who not only stir the pot but fill it full of garbage & crap, are allowed to remain? And I was told that if I didn't like it I could leave. I did not get an actual answer to my question. I then, respectfully, asked where's the logic? Why is it that the rules only apply to some, but not to others? And I had mentioned that I had been a member since 2004 and have never in all these years seen anything like that on the CT board. It was made clear that if I were to continue on this path of questioning that I too could find myself in the same position as the "others" who have been banned. I asked if that was a threat. Once again I received no answer to that question but was told that I could take their comment any way that I choose to. Keep in mind, that this whole exchange took place in PRIVATE messages, not out on the open forums, and I pointed THAT out to them as well, questioning them as to how I could possibly be breaking any of the rules by trying to find answers in private messages. More on "Private Messages" later. Just . . . Wow! |
|
|
|
Post by highgrit on Aug 6, 2019 10:55:39 GMT -6
 I saved this one when things started going south on CT. |
|
|
|
Post by highgrit on Aug 6, 2019 11:03:17 GMT -6
 Another deleted post. |
|
|
|
Post by jedstivers on Aug 6, 2019 20:16:35 GMT -6
Seriously?!! I keep telling myself that there is no way in hell Macon would make inyati a Mod, but he is the only person there who would have the gaul to give you the boot!! If you decide to go out with guns blazing, let me know ahead of time so I can make it double barreled!! Yes, seriously. I had been told that being a pain-in-the-ass is not a ban-able offense and that's why there is an "ignore" button, and that while stirring the pot is annoying, I should just "ignore" it. I then asked why is it that quite a few long-time members have been permanently banned for merely asking questions and/or posting the rules of the board and/or calling out the Mods for banning a so-called "pot stirrer" while allowing Ron & a couple of others, who not only stir the pot but fill it full of garbage & crap, are allowed to remain? And I was told that if I didn't like it I could leave. I did not get an actual answer to my question. I then, respectfully, asked where's the logic? Why is it that the rules only apply to some, but not to others? And I had mentioned that I had been a member since 2004 and have never in all these years seen anything like that on the CT board. It was made clear that if I were to continue on this path of questioning that I too could find myself in the same position as the "others" who have been banned. I asked if that was a threat. Once again I received no answer to that question but was told that I could take their comment any way that I choose to. Keep in mind, that this whole exchange took place in PRIVATE messages, not out on the open forums, and I pointed THAT out to them as well, questioning them as to how I could possibly be breaking any of the rules by trying to find answers in private messages. More on "Private Messages" later. If that was me I’d have screenshots of all that in a post on ct. course that’s just me though. |
|
|
|
Post by jehosofat on Aug 6, 2019 20:23:10 GMT -6
Yes, seriously. I had been told that being a pain-in-the-ass is not a ban-able offense and that's why there is an "ignore" button, and that while stirring the pot is annoying, I should just "ignore" it. I then asked why is it that quite a few long-time members have been permanently banned for merely asking questions and/or posting the rules of the board and/or calling out the Mods for banning a so-called "pot stirrer" while allowing Ron & a couple of others, who not only stir the pot but fill it full of garbage & crap, are allowed to remain? And I was told that if I didn't like it I could leave. I did not get an actual answer to my question. I then, respectfully, asked where's the logic? Why is it that the rules only apply to some, but not to others? And I had mentioned that I had been a member since 2004 and have never in all these years seen anything like that on the CT board. It was made clear that if I were to continue on this path of questioning that I too could find myself in the same position as the "others" who have been banned. I asked if that was a threat. Once again I received no answer to that question but was told that I could take their comment any way that I choose to. Keep in mind, that this whole exchange took place in PRIVATE messages, not out on the open forums, and I pointed THAT out to them as well, questioning them as to how I could possibly be breaking any of the rules by trying to find answers in private messages. More on "Private Messages" later. If that was me I’d have screenshots of all that in a post on ct. course that’s just me though. That's why we're banned.😁 |
|
|
|
Post by jedstivers on Aug 6, 2019 20:30:35 GMT -6
If that was me I’d have screenshots of all that in a post on ct. course that’s just me though. That's why we're banned.😁 That’s why “y’all” are banned. She isn’t and actually I’m not. I got enough of Ron and cun I mean cg8 and especially enough of no one standing up to them so I left. All I’m lacking is the energy to make the right post and I’m sure I’ll be joining the ranks of such deplorables as yourselves. 😂😂😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by jehosofat on Aug 6, 2019 20:40:38 GMT -6
Oh I stood up to CG8, her and Fence got me banned the first time. 😁
|
|
|
|
Post by fence on Aug 7, 2019 8:43:47 GMT -6
Oh I stood up to CG8, her and Fence got me banned the first time. 😁 I kinda remember that...kinda like shooting a yearling spike. Doesn't stand out.  |
|
|
|
Post by fence on Aug 7, 2019 8:46:01 GMT -6
You know what's funny is y'all whining about cg8, then whining about Raven being rude to women.
|
|
|
|
Post by jehosofat on Aug 7, 2019 8:55:24 GMT -6
You know what's funny is y'all whining about cg8, then whining about Raven being rude to women. You can leave me out of that, I never whined about BR being rude to women, I don't give a sheit what anyone says to her. She's crazy as hell and everyone knows it but you. Just about everyone on this board has been banned over there, I just had a little more gumption than to tip toe around em very long, now you can call that shootin' spikes if you want, but everyone here knows I got a bucket full of balls. |
|
I had been told that being a pain-in-the-ass is not a ban-able offense and that's why there is an "ignore" button, and that while stirring the pot is annoying, I should just "ignore" it. I then asked why is it that quite a few long-time members have been permanently banned for merely asking questions and/or posting the rules of the board and/or calling out the Mods for banning a so-called "pot stirrer" while allowing Ron & a couple of others, who not only stir the pot but fill it full of garbage & crap, are allowed to remain? And I was told that if I didn't like it I could leave. I did not get an actual answer to my question. I then, respectfully, asked where's the logic? Why is it that the rules only apply to some, but not to others? And I had mentioned that I had been a member since 2004 and have never in all these years seen anything like that on the CT board. It was made clear that if I were to continue on this path of questioning that I too could find myself in the same position as the "others" who have been banned. I asked if that was a threat. Once again I received no answer to that question but was told that I could take their comment any way that I choose to. 
Keep in mind, that this whole exchange took place in PRIVATE messages, not out on the open forums, and I pointed THAT out to them as well, questioning them as to how I could possibly be breaking any of the rules by trying to find answers in private messages.
